Tokyo, Japan, April 8, 2016 — Teijin Frontier Co., Ltd., the Teijin Group‘s fiber-products converting company, announced today that it established TEIJIN FRONTIER MEXICO S.A. DE C.V in Mexico City on February 3 as its first automotive material subsidiary in the Americas.   The company will manufacture and sell materials for auto manufacturing and serve as a headquarters for the North American market, where Teijin Frontier is aiming to expand market share by supplying rubber and materials for car seats and airbags to Japanese and other automobile companies operating in Mexico. Sales and marketing activities are scheduled to begin in July 2016.   About the Teijin Group Teijin (TSE: 3401) is a technology-driven global group offering advanced solutions in the areas of sustainable transportation, information and electronics, safety and protection, environment and energy, and healthcare. Its main fields of operation are high-performance fibers such as aramid, carbon fibers & composites, healthcare, films, resin & plastic processing, polyester fibers, products converting and IT. The group has some 150 companies and around 16,000 employees spread out over 20 countries worldwide. It posted consolidated sales of JPY786.2 billion (USD 6.6 billion) and total assets of JPY 823.7 billion (USD 6.9 billion) in the fiscal year ending March 31, 2015. Please visit www.teijin.com.

Today, the Akron Brass Company released the Revel Scout™ Scene Light to improve overall scene illumination and operational ease. The new Revel Scout is ideal for fire departments or emergency medical service teams in need of a high output, tactical scene light with multiple mounting options. Fast, Flexible Deployment Compact, lightweight and portable, the Revel Scout’s flexibility will provide you with more options than most LED scene lights to accomplish various tasks. The Revel Scout’s design allows for multiple placement options – set on a flat surface, hung on a door, strapped to a ladder or attached to drywall with its integrated spike. With a removable, rechargeable battery that can last up to 7 hours and weighing only 12 pounds, the Revel Scout simplifies fire scene lighting operations. Light Where You Need It Boasting 14,000 lumens, the Revel Scout is all you need to light your entire exterior scene and interior work area. Easy to move or position, the Revel Scout’s combination of flood and spot light optics increases overall scene visibility when lighting exterior areas such as vehicles, structures, parking lots and overhead hazards. It can then be used indoors for overhaul or any variety of other tasks. Discover more at akronbrass.com/revel-scout-pr to request a demo. About Akron Brass Company Founded in 1918, Akron Brass is a worldwide marketer and manufacturer of high performance life-safety, firefighting and emergency response equipment. Markets served consist of fire & rescue, petro-chemical, marine, military, airports, mining, specialty vehicles and bus & student transportation. Akron Brass is ISO 9001 registered and has an excellent reputation for developing and manufacturing innovative products. Headquartered in Wooster, OH, Akron Brass has additional manufacturing facilities in Columbus, OH and Washington, IL, with sales offices in Beijing, China and Dubai, UAE. 

If a fire breaks out in a factory, warehouse or other industrial premises, it is important for all parties to know the best plan of action for escape Good management of fire safety is essential to ensure that fires are unlikely to occur; that if they do occur they are likely to be controlled or contained quickly, effectively and safely; or that, if a fire does occur and grow, everyone in your premises is able to escape to a place of total safety easily and quickly.The risk assessment that you must carry out will help you ensure that your fire safety procedures, fire prevention measures, and fire precautions (plans, systems and equipment) are all in place and working properly, and the risk assessment should identify any issues that need attention. A fire risk assessment is an organised and methodical look at your premises, the activities carried on there and the likelihood that a fire could start and cause harm to those in and around the premises. The aims of the fire risk assessment are: To identify the fire hazards. To reduce the risk of those hazards causing harm to as low as reasonably practicable. To decide what physical fire precautions and management arrangements are necessary to ensure the safety of people in your premises if a fire does start. A fire risk assessment will help you determine the chances of a fire starting and the dangers from fire that your premises present for the people who use them and any person in the immediate vicinity. Much of the information for your fire risk assessment will come from the knowledge your employees, colleagues and representatives have of the premises, as well as information given to you by people who have responsibility for other parts of the building. A tour of your premises will probably be needed to confirm, amend or add detail to your initial views. It is important that you carry out your fire risk assessment in a practical and systematic way and that you allocate enough time to do a proper job. It must take the whole of your premises into account, including outdoor locations and any rooms and areas that are rarely used. If your premises are small you may be able to assess them as a whole. In larger premises you may find it helpful to divide them into rooms or a series of assessment areas using natural boundaries, e.g. process areas, offices, stores, as well as corridors, stairways and external routes. If your premises are in a multi-use complex then the information on hazard and risk reduction will still be applicable to you. However, any alterations to the use or structure of your individual unit will need to take account of the overall fire safety arrangements in the building. Your fire risk assessment should demonstrate that, as far as is reasonable, you have considered the needs of all relevant persons, including disabled people. Escape routes Once a fire has started, been detected and a warning given, everyone in your premises should be able to escape to a place of total safety unaided and without the help of the fire and rescue service. However, some people with disabilities and others with special needs may need help from staff who will need to be designated for the purpose. Escape routes should be designed to ensure, as far as possible, that any person confronted by fire anywhere in the building, should be able to turn away from it and escape to a place of reasonable safety, e.g. a protected stairway. From there they will be able to go directly to a place of total safety away from the building. Those who require special assistance (e.g. very young children in a creche and some people with disabilities) could be accommodated on the same level as the final exit from the premises to facilitate escape. Where they need assistance to evacuate, you should make sure that there are sufficient staff to ensure a speedy evacuation. The level of fire protection that should be given to escape routes will vary depending on the level of risk of fire within the premises and other related factors. Generally, premises that are simple, consisting of a single storey, will require fairly simple measures to protect the escape routes, compared to a large multi-storey building, which would require a more complex and inter-related system of fire precautions. The type and number of people using the premises The people present in your premises will primarily be employees. Employees can reasonably be expected to have an understanding of the layout of the premises, while contractors or visitors will be unlikely to have knowledge of alternative escape routes. The number and capability of people present will influence your assessment of the escape routes. You must ensure that your existing escape routes are sufficient and capable of safely evacuating all the people likely to use your premises at any time, including temporary staff employed in busy periods, and visitors. If necessary you may need either to increase the capacity of the escape routes or restrict the number of people in the premises. Escape time In the event of a fire, it is important to evacuate people as quickly as possible from the premises. Escape routes in a building should be designed so that people can escape quickly enough to ensure they are not placed in any danger from fire. The time available will depend on a number of factors, including how quickly the fire is detected and the alarm raised, the number of escape routes available, the nature of the occupants and the speed of fire growth. In high rack storage the spread of fire vertically will be rapid, so this risk should be given special consideration. The age and construction of the premises Older buildings may comprise different construction materials from newer buildings, and may be in a poorer state of repair. The materials from which your premises are constructed, the quality of building work and state of

Robert Moore, Division Director of the Emergency Training Services Institute at TEEX, tells Chris Beck about the challenges of training fire-fighters around the world for industrial disasters What sort of industrial training do TEEX offer? TEEX offers training in all aspects of emergency response to include Industrial response. All of our courses comply with NFPA Standards and most are Proboard certified. The most popular industrial training we are currently doing on the firefighting side is NFPA 1081 certification – interior, exterior and leadership training. We also offer customised industrial training to meet the core objectives of our clients may be. Often large companies with facilities spread worldwide request to do a large corporate school, bringing employees from all of their facilities to College Station, Texas Brayton Fire Field. During these schools we customise the training to meet their needs. Just as Industrial response is different than municipal response, so is the aspect of training for both. During my career I have worked in both arenas and the response to each has its own unique challenges and must be handled differently. Both types of response has a primary Life Safety concern. Typically with an Industrial event in a plant or factory setting you have a better accountability for the area involved. Also both types need a good strategy and tactical planning before any fire-fighting takes place but with Industrial response comes the concern of what type of chemicals or material may be involved. If you are an Industrial plant brigade most of the time you will already have this information through preplans. If you do not have this information you will need to approach it more on a defensive mode and as the information comes in to command start moving to an offense mode. What are the main risks that you prepare your students for? Our goal is to prepare our students to face any situation they may come across with Life Safety being the most important. At Brayton Field we have the most realistic industrial burn props in the world replicating process units that you would find in refining and chemical operations. All of our industrial props are designed by our Industrial staff who have worked in the industry and have responded to all of these types of events. Since there is a difference in response techniques and terminology between an industrial response and a municipal response, we have chosen to have our Instructors teaching each to come from that industry or Fire Department. This allows us to make the training as realistic as possible and teach our students proper strategy and tactics for each. We make sure the student gets the type of training they are coming to TEEX for. How important is realistic hands-on training for fire-fighters? It’s crucial that you not only get the classroom portion of the training, but also quality hands-on training as well. If students can see, for example, the way water patterns can be used to protect themselves and equipment from flame impingement, or how foam operations work and how to deal with pressure fires versus atmospheric types, that can only help reinforce the message they had heard in the classroom and help them better understand their life safety responsibilities. What range of industrial situations do you cater for? Our primary Industrial training is based on the petrochemical and refinery industries. Companies like Exxon Mobil, BP and Shell are our largest client base. We train them in response to process fires, transportation emergencies, hazardous materials response, rescue operations, storage tank fires, and emergency medical response. How do you teach your students to be aware of the risks of fire on top of the fire-fighting techniques? We teach our students pre-planning, where we send them to a tank farm, for example, and plan what type of fire scenario could arise. We then put together a pre-plan that can be implemented should that situation happen. Doing that increases the safety for the fire-fighters, meaning they already know what equipment is likely to be available in the area, what sort of fire situation – pressure, gas, liquid and so on – may arise, what sorts of chemicals they may be dealing with. This allows them to choose the best personal protective equipment to ensure their own safety, work out how many members of the public or staff may be in an area and in need of rescue, and who is accountable for what. How do you ensure that the equipment that you use is as modern and up-to-date as possible? We work with our numerous vendors, who help us with supplying the most up-to-date tools for our fire-fighters to use in the training field. We make sure that the equipment is true-to-life and unaltered and give the students the chance to try different types of the same tool. We don’t typically recommend one particular brand or manufacturer, but we would recommend different types. For example, if we have a new type of foam eductor, we may encourage our students to work with it and look at vendors who produce products like it. How have you seen the techniques that are taught change over the years, and do you think standards of training globally are as high as they should be? Techniques do evolve. We learn through trial and era. The best place to learn is on the training ground and not an emergency scene. We allow our students to try different techniques and make mistakes to learn from. In terms of training around the world, the more industrialised countries tend to be a bit further ahead of the curve as far as adopting new techniques and equipment is concerned. We do training all over the world, not just here in Texas. We are in 58 different countries, dealing with our students and offering training in all four corners of the globe, and take the most up-to-date techniques and equipment with us to our students, wherever they may be. We have what we call Cooperative Learning

Mikael Westerlund, CTO of Savox Communications, explains how industrial disasters pose unique and numerous challenges for search & rescue teams and fire brigades alike Deploying to scenes of devastation following earthquakes, tornadoes and hurricanes and getting a search started at the earliest possible time is the typical stuff of USAR (Urban Search and Rescue) team work and equipment deployment. Where fire plays a part in structural failure and building collapse, however, it’s not always possible for USAR teams to get started until the fire services have a situation under control. Scene setting – Bosley Mill Disaster On Friday July 17 2015, just after 0900hrs, an explosion at the Wood Treatment Limited wood mill in Bosley, Cheshire, UK, resulted in a major fire and structural collapse incident. Some 15 fire appliances were on the scene by 1030hrs by which time it was known that two explosions had taken place and four wood mill employees were missing, presumed trapped. The cause of the explosion was the ignition of wood dust, or ‘flour’, produced at the plant to make wood-laminate flooring; also present were quantities of heating oil, kerosene, acetylene and asbestos adding to the combustibles and dangerous chemicals on site. When materials such as grain or wood are handled in an industrial scenario the creation of dust is inevitable. When that dust is confined in an enclosed space with a good source of oxygen in the air, the only thing missing to create a dust explosion is a spark or ignition source. This might come in the form of static build-up due to a storm front, or an unnoticed mechanical malfunction of a piece of equipment causing a spark or heat build-up. Exactly what the source was in Bosley on that first morning is unclear, but the Cheshire Fire Brigade described as ‘fully developed’, fires in several areas of the site from the outset. It was also ascertained early in the chaos that a four-storey building had collapsed among the devastation. With the prospect of further explosions the fire services had to proceed with extreme caution, the main method of fighting the fires being the use of water. As the fire crews tackled the fire and first injured were transferred to hospital, (some 35 people suffered injuries of varying severity), three regional USAR teams were called on by late morning to attend the scene. By 1800hrs it was clear that the ‘large multi-agency team’ that was now gathered, including USAR teams from Merseyside and Lancashire, would have to remain at least over the weekend. Both these teams were equipped with a number of Searchcam 3000s and LD3-4 Delsar life detection systems from Savox Communications, which were used on many occasions throughout the incident. The Cheshire Fire Brigade continued pouring huge quantities of water on the fires, including the silos containing wood flour that was still burning and stated on that first day that its crews were ‘working tirelessly to ensure that search and rescue teams could safely access the site’ as soon as possible to search for those missing. By 0730hrs on July 18, almost 24 hours after the first explosion, the specialist USAR teams began initial assessments. Shortly after, the county’s search dog, Bryn, and his handler began work, with other search dogs joining later. By lunchtime, SAR efforts were well underway, the manual work involved in finding those missing aided as much as possible by the use of the Savox search and rescue cameras as well as the life-detection systems. The following day, demolition and specialist heavy lifting gear were used to clear a path to the search area at the centre of the site for the USAR teams. During the night, USAR teams had discovered a body in one of two key areas that had been identified as ‘of interest’ by Bryn. USAR efforts continued through the 20th alongside the fire-fighters who were continuing to cool the site, though with the number of fire crews now reduced to five. With the reality of the situation apparent, USAR teams went from search and rescue to search and recovery mode. By lunchtime on July 21 a second body had been found. At 1630hrs that day it was announced that work within a collapsed structure on the site had begun though dark, humid and smoky conditions inside were more challenging than ever. After three of the silos were removed on July 22 this enabled further search and recovery work on July 23 in an area that had been focused on by search dogs early on. On the morning of July 27, a fresh USAR team from West Yorkshire arrived on site to replace the crews from Lancashire who, like their Merseyside counterparts, had attended since the start. The Merseyside USAR group remained and continued working with the West Yorkshire team. A full two weeks after the incident began on July 31, the USAR teams were still working 24/7 to locate the missing, while fire-fighters continued to monitor and cool the site. USAR teams remained onsite throughout August. Equipment deployed – fire impact With the devastation and dangerous chaos at Bosley, the use of dogs at an early stage was essential and proved exacting in locating two of the victims later; trained SAR dogs, like Bryn, are responsible for a many victim-location SAR successes. Also deployed at Bosley, however, were technical search tools, including Delsar seismic/acoustic life-detection equipment and SearchCam 3000 telescopic cameras. Both these were used in combination during the SAR phase. Once the recovery phase had begun, however, the SearchCam 3000 stood alone in the ongoing search for the missing. Using the life-detector system in the SAR phase it was, of course, hoped to locate live victims in the rubble pile, with the seismic sensors designed for attaching to beams, or girders, or other surface on which they can detect any sound vibrations generated by a victim. They can also be pushed firmly into the ground using a screw-in spike, with magnetic attachments also able to attach the sensors to

[responsive-flipbook id=”feb/mar_2016″]